keyboard_backspaceBack to main blog page

PMC Insurance Group

Read articles, watch webinars, training material for practically any topic in the insurance industry.

Search Results

Posts tagged with state - state

Workers Compensation Programs

Author DavidMalloy , 10/17/2016
At PMC we can provide your agency access to a wide range of markets to better service your clients. Our Markets cover a broad appetite for accounts with favorable loss experience over $75,000 such as Construction, Healthcare, Hospitality, Manufacturing. PMC can offer guaranteed cost, retros and large deductible options.

New Jersey Agents - Access Top-Rated Carriers

Author DavidMalloy , 10/5/2016
For the past 20 years, PMC has been developing one of the
Broadest Underwriting Appetites in the Industry. If it's Guarantee Cost, Loss Sensitive or Alternative Markets, PMC has the expertise and market connections to find your Solution!

Florida Adjusters Win Free Speech Case Against 48-Hour Solicitation Rule

Author DavidMalloy , 7/9/2012

Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry NewsA 2008  Florida law establishing a 48-hour moratorium on public adjusters has been ruled unconstitutional by the Florida Supreme Court on grounds that it restricts commercial speech.

The decision was a blow to the insurance industry and Chief Financial Officer Jeff Atwater, who appealed a lower court ruling that was unanimously upheld by the state’s highest court. Public adjusters serve as advocates for policyholders while negotiating insurance claims. The overturned law had prevented them from getting involved in insurance cases for at least 48 hours after the occurrence of an event.

The association representing Florida public adjusters applauded the ruling.

“The ban on solicitation is a violation of public adjusters’ free speech rights — and more importantly, an unfair rule that put policyholders at a disadvantage,” said Harvey Wolfman, president of the Florida Association of Public Insurance Adjusters. “Thanks to this ruling, we can help more policyholders in those critical first hours when they need it most.”  

Atwater’s office, however, did not quibble with the ruling.

“The office respects the Supreme Court’s authority and its ruling in this case,” said Atwater spokeswoman Alexis Lambert, who added that Atwater’s role in the case was one intended to support consumers.

The insurance industry, however, sided with Atwater’s challenge largely because many commercial insurers provide their own adjusters to assist in claims.

“CFO Atwater and the Office of Insurance Regulation provide safeguards for hurricane victims that they will be treated fairly by the adjuster dispatched by their insurance company,” said Sam Miller, vice president of the Florida Insurance Council, an industry group. “There is no need for a public adjuster who must be paid by the policyholder. Unlike legal fees in lawsuits against insurers, fees for a public adjuster come from the insurance settlement.”

Public adjusters have been held to increased scrutiny in recent years, largely as a result of thousands of claims that drifted in over a five-year period in the aftermath of Hurricane Wilma in the fall of 2005. The scrutiny also has resulted from sinkhole claims in the greater Tampa Bay area that have slammed commercial carriers and the state-backed Citizens Property Insurance Corp.

The Florida Legislature passed the law four years ago to create the waiting period before property owners would be able to receive any information from public adjusters about potential damages in the aftermath of a storm.

“The statute unconstitutionally restricts the commercial speech of public adjusters because it is not narrowly tailored to serve the state’s interests in ensuring ethical conduct by public adjusters and protecting homeowners,” the court said.

The lawsuit was originally brought by in October 2009 by public adjuster Frederick W. Kortum against Atwater’s predecessor, former CFO Alex Sink. A trial court ruled in favor of the state, but that decision was then overturned by the 1st DCA and affirmed by the Supreme Court ruling.

California Workers’ Comp Reform Taking Shape – Again

Author DavidMalloy , 6/6/2012


"At a recent joint hearing in Sacramento on workers’ compensation in California with the Assembly and Senate, statistic after statistic flew out of the mouths of speaker after speaker during the nearly four-hour session.

It was titled, “Informational Hearing, Injured Workers Since SB 899: A Discussion on the Impacts of SB 899 on Permanent Disability Benefits.”

But the hearing was beyond a focus on permanent disability and the aftereffects of sweeping workers’ comp reform enacted in the last decade.

“I think we all agree that we’ve moved out of that post-reform period into another pre-reform period,” said Alex Swedlow, executive vice president of research at the California Workers’ Compensation Institute.

CWCI, a private, nonprofit organization of insurers licensed to write workers’ compensation in California, was one of many presenters at the hearing offering their taken on what problems the system has developed in recent years.

In fact the tone of most speakers suggested another reform package approaching the magnitude of Senate Bill 899, the legislation signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2004 that changed or affected just about every part of the state’s workers’ comp system.

And last year Gov. Jerry Brown in signing several pieces of workers’ compensation legislation called for more comprehensive reform to be brought to his desk, saying that reform should be addressed on “a broad and balanced scale.”

Brown’s wishes were echoed at the joint hearing, where stats were given that showed just how big and unwieldy the state’s workers’ comp system is both in billions and in complexity.

Depending on who was giving the stats – applicants’ attorneys, insurers, the medical community, employer representatives – those numbers often showed different entities bearing an unfair share of the burden of a system that now seems to again be broken.

One person stated that workers’ comp medical treatment costs have been rising in excess of 10 percent each year in the wake of the systemic reform spearheaded by Schwarzenegger during his tenure.

Another speaker noted that accident year combined ratios are up around 130 percent, making those ratios well in excess of premiums. Following that someone noted that injured workers are getting 60 percent less in benefits today than in the pre-reform era.

But the speakers and their stats had two things in common: they painted a portrait of a system that’s broken, and all seemed to agree comprehensive reform is necessary.

Senate Labor and Industrial Relations Chair Ted Lieu, D-Torrance, headed the meeting along with Assembly Chair Jose Solario, D-Santa Anna. Both have drafted successful legislation to address areas of workers’ comp.

Lieu’s SB 863 will begin the process of reforming how the hundreds of thousands of liens filed each year are handled in the adjudicatory process. Solorio’s AB 378 removed financial incentives associated with prescribing expensive compound medications.

Both legislators during the hearing indicated more workers’ comp legislation is needed.

Lieu, who spoke to Insurance Journal following the March 28 hearing, said he believes several more bills will come out of Legislature next year as part of a comprehensive workers’ comp reform package. He and others at the hearing also said regulatory changes should be part of the reform.

“My view is to deliver as much cost savings as I can to the governor,” Lieu said.

The comprehensive reform—Lieu said it’s too early to describe exactly how it would look—would have to address two issues, he said. One is permanent disability benefits, which he said were drastically cut “to an extent that even the proponents of last decade’s reform did not intend.”

The second workers’ comp must, he said, is to make sure that premium rates do not rise in the future.

“There is evidence that workers’ comp companies are paying out more than they are taking in in premiums,” he said.

Such evidence was presented in detail by California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones, who was at the hearing to offer his thoughts on the system.

Jones, a Democrat who just completed his first term as insurance commissioner, began by noting that in 1995 the workers comp market was deregulated by Legislature, leading to opening ratings replacing minimum rates. Fierce price competition ensued, he added.

“With no minimum rate law, carriers reduced rates below solvency,” Jones said.

The Department of Insurance was forced to take over and liquidate 31 carriers between 1997 and 2006, and California’s workers’ comp insurer of last resort, State Compensation Insurance Fund, swelled and was at one point writing over 50 percent of total market, Jones said.

Ultimate accident year loss ratios were at 141 percent of premium, and by 2003 workers’ comp rates paid by employers per $100 climbed to $6.29, he added.

Then came SB 899, which ushered in sweeping change and got control of upwardly spiraling costs, but “These major changes came at the expense of injured workers,” Jones said.

Quoting data from CWCI that shows average medical expenses per claim have been increasing by at least 10 percent per year from 2005 to 2009, Jones noted that increase in utilization was the main driver.

He also spoke about the positive impact of workers’ comp reforms, but those impacts may be losing steam since the rising costs “likely signal erosion in these measures.”

In fact, Jones expressed concern the market dynamic may lead to a correction, and eventually to higher premiums due to underwriters being more cautious and raising premiums on risky businesses.

“We can’t say for certain when a market correction will occur,” Jones said, adding that it’s also not known whether a correction will be moderate or severe.

During questioning of Jones by committee members, he noted there are definitive indicators that workers’ comp insurers are experiencing ever-increasing losses.

“There appears to be significant evidence that combined ratios are in excess of premiums right now,” he said.

There are several cost savings measures being looked at, including possible enhancements or changes to medical costs containment and utilization, but DOI is not at the place to introduce them, Jones said, adding, “We need to identify what those additional cost savings measures are.”

Marty Morgenstern, secretary of the California Labor & Workforce Development Agency, testified that the need to raise permanent disability is paramount. However, that goal cannot be achieved on the backs of employers, he cautioned.

“The permanently disabled worker is not being fairly compensated,” he said, adding, “we cannot take payroll money to do it. We cannot raise the payroll costs to employers at this time.”

Like others who testified, Morgenstern said the key to achieving workers’ comp reform is reducing wasted costs by looking at inefficiencies, as well as practices and policies that need reforming.

“We think there is money within the system that can be utilized,” he said. “We need the medical and legal practitioners, the insurers, the employees in their organizations, all working together in a cooperative way to fix this system. And that’s what’s going to do it.”

Department of Industrial Relations Director Christine Baker, and Rosa Moran, administrative director of the Division of Worker’s Compensation, offered their take on fixes and talked about their efforts to gather public input. Baker and Moran have been conducting a series of public meetings across the state to provide open forum discussions on issues in workers’ comp and to gather information from stakeholders and the public on suggestions for improvements

“We recognize the need to restore essential benefits even while working to mitigate the costs,” Baker said, noting that will likely require eliminating unnecessary costs and looking for significant savings in the system.

A consensus will “likely require legislation and regulation,” she added.

Moran said internal cost cutting in her division is already under way.

“We’ve been doing tremendous consolidations to try and bring down the costs,” she said.

Michael Nolan, CWCI president, said “there’s no doubt that permanent disability is one of the core issues.”

Looking at ultimate accident year data, it was rising to 2002, and decreased following the reforms. Now it’s beginning to rise again, he said.

“The average cost of everything associated with an indemnity claim is higher today than in 2002,” he said, adding, “it’s primarily on the medical side.”

There’s been a shift in the average claim percentage to about two-thirds expenditures on the medical side, where previously it was close to 50 percent on medical and 50 percent on indemnity.

And even with workers’ comp costs to employers at its present rate of $2.30 per $100 of payroll, “California is in the top tier,” he said.

CWCI’s Swedlow said if those involved are serious about cutting costs, there are a few places to look at and to place blame: the rising influence of attorneys, an aging work population, rising secondary injuries.

“Permanent disability has been in fact rising by about 11 percent per year,” he said, adding, “It’s harder to manage a claim in workers’ compensation relative to other systems.”

On the employer side was Sean McNally, vice president of corporate and government affairs for Grimmway Farms, considered the world’s largest carrot grower.

McNally said the cost of doing business in California is forcing Grimmway to continue to expand into other states with less problematic workers’ comp systems like Washington, Florida and Georgia.

McNally believes there is one overriding problem with California’s workers’ comp system.

“There are too many lawyers in the system; there’s too much litigation in the system,” he said.

He called for a system that’s “more administrative, more predictable, more affordable.”

But such ideology doesn’t set well with some.

Brad Chalk, president of the California Applicants’ Attorneys Association, argued that it’s workers who are being neglected and suffering the largest burden of the state’s dysfunctional workers’ comp system.

“The California constitution says that the people are supposed to have benefits, and they’re supposed to be adequate benefits,” he said. “The focus that this has taken is all about the insurance company.”

He added, “If you think that this is a hard economy, try being an injured worker.”

Angie Wei, legislative director off the California Labor Federation, blamed “unneeded speed bumps in the system that is screwing the injured workers.” She added: “permanent disability benefits got slashed much deeper than they were intended too.”

Wei suggested that while looking at inefficiencies and waste, “we should look at a minimum loss ratio. A bottom-line loss ratio. What’s good enough for the health insurers should be good enough for the workers’ comp insurers.”

She added that would shine “a brighter light into the insurance industry.”"

Ask the Workers’ Comp Expert: NCCI to Change Experience Modification Formula

Author DavidMalloy , 5/8/2012
Ask the Workers’ Comp Expert: NCCI to Change Experience Modification Formula
by Robert G. Jones, Vice President, PMC Insurance Group

Typically, business owners paying $5,000 or more annually in workers’ compensation insurance premium qualify to be experience rated (some variations by state). The result is an insurance premium modification factor will be calculated annually for such businesses based upon individual three prior years’ payroll and loss history. This data is reported to the appropriate rating bureaus by the individual business owner’s past insurance companies.

In general, historical loss data for a particular business is compared to the average loss data for all similar businesses in its state of domicile. This comparison results in a debit or credit experience modification factor that is used to adjust the business owner’s annual workers’ compensation insurance premium. Most states use the National Council on Compensation Insurance to calculate experience modification factors for individual businesses. A few states, including New York, have their own separate workers’ compensation rating bureaus.

Effective January 2013, NCCI will implement a new formula for calculating experience modification factors. The key change in the formula is the increase in the loss per claim, from $5,000 currently to $15,000 in the new formula. Thus the size of losses per claim will have significantly greater impact on driving up the experience modification factors for business owners with large individual claims. (More information to come in the months ahead.)

PMC Insurance Group is IIABNY’s endorsed workers’ compensation specialist. Our insurance professionals have extensive experience helping IIABNY members expand their marketing capabilities by providing workers’ compensation solutions for their clients. Give Bob Jones a call at (440) 313-5002.  

 Operating in the Continental US!
 Phone: 1-877-PMC-COMP| (781)-449-7744
Email PMC | Visit our website

MA Workers Comp Rates Could Increase By 19.3 Percent

Author DavidMalloy , 4/2/2012
PMC Insurance Group The cost of employee compensation insurance for Massachusetts employers could rise dramatically later this year if rates proposed by insurers are approved by state regulators.

The Workers’ Compensation Rating and Inspection Bureau of Massachusetts, which represents companies that write workers’ compensation polices, asked the state to approve an average rate increase of 19.3 percent. Most businesses are required to carry workers’ compensation insurance, which covers the medical treatment, rehabilitation, and lost wages of employees injured on the job.

If approved, the rates would go into effect in September.

The substantial increase is necessary, the bureau said, because the cost of claims continues to rise, but the state has denied smaller requests in three of the past four years. The Division of Insurance rejected proposed increases of 2.3 percent increase in 2008, 4.5 percent increase in 2010, and a 6.6 percent increase in 2011.

“If these three small increases in rates had been granted by the Commonwealth,’’ said Paul Meagher, president of the Workers’ Compensation Rating and Inspection Bureau of Massachusetts, “we would not need such a significant rate increase now.’’

Richard C. Lord, president of Associated Industries of Massachusetts, the state’s largest employers’ group, said yesterday in a blog post that the rate request deserves consideration. He said he is concerned that without an increase, fewer companies will offer the insurance, making it harder for businesses to buy policies.

“Private-market coverage is harder to come by because the economics of workers compensation no longer add up for insurers,’’ Lord wrote. “The growing disconnect between costs and premiums has already prompted several insurance companies to scale back their activity in Massachusetts.’’

Massachusetts once had some of the highest worker compensation costs in the country, but following reforms in 1991, those costs have declined steadily, falling by two-thirds over the past 20 years. If a premium cost $100 in 1991, the current rate would be $33.21. If the new rate request is approved, that premium would rise to $39.62, according to the Workers’ Compensation Rating and Inspection Bureau of Massachusetts.

The bureau said insurers need the increase to cover the rising costs of health care and wage replacement, driven by higher salaries and the longer leaves that claimants are taking. The number of claims has declined, but not fast enough to offset the increases in medical and wage replacement costs, the bureau said.

“While we recognize that the current filing calls for a significant rate increase, it reflects the real costs of providing this kind of insurance,’’ said Meagher. “Without a rate increase, we will be unable to maintain a competitive market for workers’ compensation insurance in Massachusetts.’’

The proposed rates will be examined in hearings held by Joseph G. Murphy, the state insurance commissioner. Murphy said yesterday that his office intends to “take a long, hard look at the process. This is a large increase, and this administration is particularly sensitive to the cost of doing business in the state.’’

Murphy said he expects to schedule a public hearing by the end of March.  

This article is courtesy of, Source- Boston Globe dated mar 2, 2012  

Call us today and put our expertise to work for you!

PMC Insurance Group (P) 877-PMC-COMP (P) 781-449-7744 (F) 781-449-7889


To contact us, and for more information, please visit our CompleteMarkets storefront.

NY Lawmakers To Consider Raising Minimum Wage To 8.50 An Hour

Author DavidMalloy , 3/28/2012
PMC Insurance Group NEW YORK – Hundreds of thousands of workers making minimum wage in New York could soon be getting a big raise.
Minimum wage workers haven’t seen a pay increase in three years. That could soon change, since State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver reportedly plans to introduce a bill today, raising the state’s minimum wage from $7.25 an hour to $8.50. That’s a 17 percent increase. The bill would also require the rate to be adjusted annually for inflation. Nationwide, 18 states already have a higher minimum wage rate. Earlier this month, Silver spoke about the need to bring New York up to par. He said the current minimum wage is unrealistically low. “It’s absurd to expect anyone, let alone a working family, to afford the cost of living today,” he said. It’s an issue both Governor Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Michael Bloomberg have championed recently. “The cost of living in New York City, like nearly everywhere else, has gone up,” Bloomberg said during his annual State of the City address. “And not just housing, but food, transit and all the key parts of a family’s budget. But there’s one thing that, in all fairness, hasn’t gone up: The ability of those at the bottom of the economic ladder to pay for those essential needs.”  

To keep a hold of your finances, contact your local insurance agent today!
This article courtesy of CBSNewYork  

Call us today and put our expertise to work for you!

PMC Insurance Group (P) 877-PMC-COMP (P) 781-449-7744 (F) 781-449-7889


To contact us, and for more information, please visit our CompleteMarkets storefront.