CompleteMarkets – Where Insurance Goes to Network™CompleteMarkets – Where Insurance Goes to Network™

IN-N-OUT BURGER SUED FOR DISCRIMINATION

I have a confession to make: I love In-N-Out Burger. As with any type of fast food, you can't eat it frequently, but it's amazingly good when you do. Both of my sons worked for In-N-Out; and the company has some of the best employees and managers in the fast food industry. They pride themselves in being a well-meaning Christian company. They pay more than anyone else in the industry and treat their employees with respect. Unfortunately, two plaintiffs, both of whom are black and older than 40, were rejected for employment and, after seeing an attorney, filed a class action lawsuit.

Companies such as In-N-Out can face discrimination and disparate impact type claims because their statistics for hiring don't match the general applicant pool. If this proves out to be the case is there in fact a bias? I don't see it and doubt if the company practices any systemic discrimination. The only bias I can see is that In-N-Out demands a high level of performance from its employees. Very simply, if you're too old to move quickly, you're going to get run over by a quicker and probably younger employee. I would like to think that regardless of your age, race, or sex, if you can play team the In-N-Out Burger way and produce as efficiently as the other workers, you certainly deserve a job.

My favorite comment among all the comments posted about this case (with more than 90% pro In-N-Out) was:

    "Actually, In-n-Out does discriminate...

    ...against lazy, shiftless, self-entitled whiners, which is why you see a lot of ambitious, courteous, and diligent Latinos, Asians, whites, and Samoans working there,

    and which is why its service is so fantastic."
Need insurance for You, Your Family or Your Business?
We can match you to a qualified, local insurance expert!
Get A Quote
Further Reading
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has sued Toys "R" Us, Inc. for alleged disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act. A deaf woman applied for a job at the toy retailer's store in Columbia, MD. She was denied ...
The construction industry has changed dramatically over the past fifty years. Material handling and lifting have gone from manual to mechanized. Workers need to be smarter not stronger. This evolution opens the door to more women on the construc...
For an employer embroiled in a discrimination lawsuit, summary judgment is usually the last opportunity to get the case dismissed before going to trial. A decision by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals demonstrates how lying about the reason f...
In Lawler v. Montblanc, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of an employer where the evidence was insufficient, as a matter of law, to substantiate claims for disability discriminatio...
In a case that illustrates how a supervisor’s ill-advised comments can come back to haunt a company, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently revived a discrimination case by an older employee who had been laid off. In Sharp v. Ake...