Search CompleteMarkets

Making The Most Out Of An Agency Business Combination
MAKING THE MOST OUT OF AN AGENCY BUSINESS COMBINATION by Carol Hammes It’s what comes after the handshakes that counts. INTRODUCTION You’ve done the groundwork for a successful combination of agencies (acquisition, merger, or cluster). But what comes after the handshakes will be even more critical in determining the eventual outcome. The initial evaluation and structuring process will determine much of what needs to be accomplished. Parties involved have made an emotional and financial commitment to invest in this course of action. You owe it to yourselves to follow through for as long as it takes to maximize the payback on this investment. Here’s how: KEEP THE SELLER INTERESTED Most transactions involve at least one owner who is selling their ownership interest as part of the deal. In some situations, the buyers might prefer that a selling owner disappear (quickly) after the sale. However, it’s usually better to have the sellers stay involved for a while by building a retention or growth incentive into the purchase price. If you want the seller to take a hike, don’t include any incentive — except perhaps one that pays them to stay away! The simplest and most common incentive is to buy the book of business strictly on a retention basis. Determine the appropriate percentage using the pro forma cash flow that you developed and adjust this for timing considerations. If the seller wants the money over a shorter period, the percentage of renewal commissions paid can be higher. But the total amount paid out might be lower than if the payout period is longer. For example, in a fold-in situation, you might be able to afford as much as 40% of renewal commissions for three years. An alternative that might provide more money for the seller and a longer period of involvement would be to pay 30% for five years. Since the buyer must take the tax deduction for the expirations and covenant payments over 15 years, more and more transactions will probably be structured over longer pay-out periods. If a straight earn-out deal isn’t appropriate, there are a number of other ways to keep the seller involved over a period of time. Here are some suggestions that can work for both external acquisitions and those in which the interest of a retiring owner is being purchased internally: Offer an employment contract that pays the person a percentage of the commissions as a servicing producer on the book of business. Structure a production bonus that pays a certain percentage of total commissions received on the portion that exceeds the cash flow projections. Pay the seller a finder’s fee for new accounts brought to the agency. In most cases, it’s not wise to pay the person as a servicing producer on the renewal of those accounts, but a hefty new business commission percentage might be in order. When a branch is being acquired and the seller is being retained as a manager for a few years, set up a separate profit center with a bonus arrangement that pays a large percentage of the profits that exceed the plan. This will provide a reward for higher commissions, lower expenses, and/or both. Agree to a guaranteed price, but with installments to be reduced if the commissions do not remain at predetermined minimum levels. Hire the person to perform management functions (company relations, computer installation, training of salespeople or CSRs) and pay a combination of salary and results-oriented bonus based on an increase in contingent income, increase in revenue per employee or commissions per producer or CSR, or some other formula that tracks with the tasks that have been assigned. You can also add non-monetary incentives to keep the seller interested in the ultimate success of the transaction. For example, you might want to include them in the agency planning process, hand out a title such as Vice President, provide an office, or simply ask for their advice from time to time. PLAN FOR THE TRANSITION It’s important to anticipate reactions from those parties both inside and outside the agency that the transaction will affect in some way: Agency employees, insurance company managers/reps, vendors, accounts, and prospects. 1. Spread the Word! In general, the more information that you share with employees of all the agencies involved and the more input you solicit in advance of the actual transfer, the more positive the transition will be. Some people handle change better than others, but everyone feels additional stress when facing the unknown. If you can reduce the mystery surrounding your plans, you’ll receive more support from the key players and less disruption from those who are determined to subvert the efforts. Of course, premature announcements can also be damaging, so there’s a fine line to walk Experience has shown that it’s usually better to err on the side of sharing too much, rather than sharing too little. Those of you who have been witness to agency employees hearing about a sale from a company underwriter know what we’re talking about. If the transfer of an insurance company contract is instrumental in the decision to do the deal, the buyer will have been involved in discussions with the branch manager at the outset of the negotiations. Companies that are shared by at least two of the agencies involved should also be contacted before closing with regard to the future treatment of contingent calculations and commission scales. Because most companies have a variety of agency contracts, you’ll want to lobby for the most advantageous one. When the acquiring agency has an important or preferred relationship with a carrier, find out if this company has a problem with the other agency before you finalize the deal. Is the acquisition worth losing an important market? The other companies involved do not need any special advance contact. You’ll need to decide which vendors to use for office supplies, advertising, phone, cars, etc. — but that can usually wait until after the transaction has been completed. If the agencies involved have different automation systems, some advance planning and contact might be necessary. When suppliers are also agency clients, you might need to take special measures before the public announcement to decide what, if anything, might change about the relationship and then to communicate this information to the vendor-clients involved. Most existing accounts and prospects will first hear about the business combination through the news story and/or ad in the local newspaper, cable TV, or radio. How you present the situation will leave a lasting impression so it’s important to plan the announcement carefully. In a merger or cluster, there might be a new name and new management philosophy that can be shared. If one agency is being acquired by another, it might be better for public relations purposes to refer to it as a “merger” or “affiliation,” rather than a “sale.” In addition to the general announcement, each client and prospect in all of the agencies involved should be sent a letter describing the business combination and its purpose. Even if the insured is associated with the “surviving” agency, it’s important to provide reassurance that nothing will change, or that the changes will be an improvement. This would also be a good opportunity to solicit additional coverages on Personal Lines and small Commercial Lines accounts. 2. Review All Accounts: Immediately after closing, review all larger Commercial Lines accounts. Within the first month, the seller and the new producer should visit all accounts in the selling agency that produced more than 1% of the total agency commissions. The purpose is to get acquainted and do a risk management review of the exposures and coverages. Accounts that produced from .5% to 1% of agency commissions should receive a similar visit within the first three months. Any other Commercial Lines accounts that produced more than $3,000 or so in commissions in rural areas, or $5,000 in urban areas, should be visited before the first renewal to let them know that the new agency wants to keep their business. PLAN FOR THE FUTURE Since you’ve done the acquisition, merger, or cluster to enhance your opportunities for growth and profitability, you need to develop a business plan that addresses the new options and defines who needs to do what for the agency to pursue the most advantageous course of action. Use the attached Worksheet as a starting point in the planning process. Add the revenues, total number of employees (including owners, producers, and former owners if they will be working at the agency more than 30 hours a week), number of producers, Commercial Lines commissions, Commercial Lines staff, Personal Lines commissions, and Personal Lines staff. Use these basic standards to compute the productivity measurements for the combined agencies, compare them to the average agency standard, and then project future needs based on anticipated revenue and commission growth. This involves several elements. Staff Restructuring Some employees might not be comfortable with the new organization and decide to leave. If you determine how many people you need in the agency and in the major departments, you’ll know in advance whether you’ll need to replace those who quit, and, if so, what type of candidates you should look for. When several stand-alone agencies are being combined, certain positions will invariably be redundant. In a cluster or merger situation, you’ll also face the problem of who is to be in charge at the top management level. Each agency had its own management structure and now one person must be given the responsibility for managing each of the functional areas of the agency. It’s critical that you discuss this and decide where the responsibility and authority will reside before the agencies combine. Perhaps one former owner can be the Sales Manager, one the Operations Manager, one the Marketing/Company Relations Manager, one the Financial Services/Health Manager, etc. But where will the buck stop for real? Although the new organization will not need two Office Managers, a higher level job position of Operations Manager might be called for. An agency with automated accounting in which the CSRs do the invoicing will probably only need one person in bookkeeping unless it’s larger than $2.5 million or so in revenues. One receptionist with a part-time back-up can handle all but the very largest agencies. You might be able to reduce the number of people handling claims — or you might have the luxury of deciding whether to separate the claims function from the service function and set up a new Claims department. The combined agency might be large enough to have an Administrative department handle the clerical duties of the CSRs. This might also be the time to create a new type of sales position that’s dedicated to servicing accounts (perhaps those of a retiring owner). You might also have the opportunity to differentiate between the types of CSRs, with some dedicated more to sales, others to technical processing, and still others to marketing/placement. Growing so rapidly, can easily compound over-staffing situations and end up adding more of the wrong kind of bodies. Having a management plan will reduce the chance for error. It will also allow the individual employees to see how the business combination can benefit them. With more specialization and differentiation in the types of jobs, they can see the advantage of continuing their education because there is indeed “room to grow” in the agency. Procedures As part of the initial planning for the new agency operation, be sure to conduct a complete review of all procedures. Sometimes organizations are forced into this evaluation because everyone had a different computer system and they are all converting to one. But even if there’s not such a dramatic need, this is an ideal time to track down and eliminate the duplicate work and the lost delegation opportunities. It’s far better to come up with a new “better” way than to force one group of employees to adopt a set of procedures that don’t seem to be an improvement over what they did in their agency. The morale problems that can develop from the battle over “ours versus theirs” can literally destroy all of the hoped-for economies from the merger. Company Relations The new strategic plan should also address company relations. Draw up a chart with the combined premium volumes, policy counts, and loss ratios for each carrier represented. Decide which companies you want to grow with in what lines of business, who is hot on what types of accounts, and where there might be sales opportunities for the agency if additional markets were obtained for certain lines or niches. At the end of the first calendar year, present your plan for growth to selected companies, old and new. Renegotiate contracts with the lead companies based on the new volume levels. The agency might now qualify for Top-of-the-Heap status — or, at the very least, you might be able to get some better commission rates. Use the merger as a catalyst to pursue actively the type of company relationships that the agency needs. BUSINESS COMBINATION PLANNING WORKSHEET Average Agency A Agency B Combined 12-Mo. Plan 2-Yr Plan Revenues             # Employees             Rev/Employees $72,000           # Producers             Rev/Producer $240,000           Commer.Comm.             Commer.Staff             Commiss/Staff $165,000           PersonalComm.             Pers. Staff             Commiss/Staff               The late Carol Hammes, principal of The Middleton Group, was one of the Independent Agency System’s most widely respected management consultants. She will be sorely missed.

Environmental Contractors - Combination Policy from Intercorp, Inc. Intercorp, Inc. offers a flexible, paper-friendly insurance solution designed for environmental contractors and consultants. Our Environmental Contractors - Combination Policy lets you package General Liability, Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL), and Professional Liability (E&O) into a single coordinated policy. You can combine any two of the three coverages or include all three, giving you control to match coverage to a client’s operations. Bundling these exposures under one policy helps eliminate gaps and conflicts that sometimes occur when liability, pollution, and professional coverages are placed separately. Intercorp places this business through a variety of admitted and non-admitted markets to help you find terms that fit each account’s risk profile. Ideal Accounts and Target Classes This program suits a broad range of environmental service firms, including small to mid-size contractors and consulting shops. Typical classes we write include: Air quality monitoring and consulting Environmental compliance services Phase I, II, and III environmental site assessments Environmental remedial investigations Geotechnical and geophysical consulting Asbestos or lead abatement and mold remediation Storage tank installation, removal, and testing Groundwater and soil remediation Wetlands delineation and consulting Radon mitigation contracting and assessment Hazardous materials packaging and consulting Industrial hygiene and health & safety consulting Accounts that perform field testing, small-to-midsize remediation projects, compliance audits, and consultant-only engagements are typically a good fit. Clients with specialized, high-severity industrial remediation or ongoing operations with unlimited pollutant exposures may require placement in specialized markets. Coverage Highlights and Advantages Simplified policy administration — one carrier relationship and one effective date for combined exposures. Coordinated terms and limits to reduce gaps between GL, CPL, and professional E&O coverages. Flexible packaging — choose any two coverages or all three to reflect actual operations. Access to multiple markets through Intercorp to help secure competitive terms for non-standard risks. For example, you might have a client who performs both mold remediation and indoor air quality consulting. With Intercorp’s combination policy you can address their pollution and professional exposures together, avoiding conflicting exclusions or duplicate coverage triggers. Underwriting Considerations and Minimum Premiums Submissions should include a completed application, detailed description of services, project history, and loss runs. Underwriting focuses on scope of operations, revenue by class, safety programs, and prior loss experience. Minimum premiums generally start around $2,500 but can vary by carrier, limits, and coverages selected. Appetite and Typical Restrictions We commonly place: Environmental consultants, site assessors, and small remediation firms Remedial investigators and contractors working on discrete projects Mold, asbestos, lead abatement, and radon mitigation contractors with documented procedures We typically do not place accounts that require high-limit, long-term environmental indemnities for large industrial sites, or those with unresolved catastrophic losses. In borderline cases, we can often find specialist markets through our E&S placement options. Territories and Availability This program is available across the United States, including all 50 states and Washington, D.C. Intercorp can place business on admitted or non-admitted paper as appropriate for the account and state requirements. Why Work with Intercorp, Inc.? Intercorp is an experienced Excess & Surplus Lines broker with deep relationships in environmental markets. Our niche focus on environmental exposures, combined with access to multiple carriers, helps you secure coordinated coverage for complex risks. We provide responsive underwriting feedback and work with agents to tailor packages that balance price and protection. Example Scenarios You have a small consulting firm that performs Phase I and Phase II ESAs plus limited groundwater sampling. You can package GL and Professional Liability to address both on- and off-site exposures. A mold remediation contractor also offers indoor air quality testing. Combining CPL and Professional Liability under one policy can reduce gaps and simplify claims handling if work overlaps. Frequently Asked Questions What types of accounts are a good fit for this program? The program is ideal for environmental consultants, remediation contractors, and service providers handling pollution-related work, including mold, asbestos, radon, and hazardous materials. Can I choose only two of the three coverages offered? Yes. You can bundle any two of the following: General Liability, Contractors Pollution Liability, and Professional Liability to match your client’s exposures. Is this program available in all states? Yes. Intercorp makes this program available in all 50 states and Washington, DC, and can place on admitted or non-admitted paper depending on the state and the account. What is the typical minimum premium? Minimum premiums generally start at about $2,500, though final pricing will depend on the scope of services, limits, and the carrier selected. What underwriting information is required to submit? Provide a completed application, a description of services, revenue by class, project history, and loss runs. Detailed submissions help us identify the best markets and terms. Need help placing an account? Connect with a market specialist.

Business Combinations: Surviving/Thriving With A Merger
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS: SURVIVING/THRIVING WITH A MERGER by Carol Hammes These guidelines will help you meet the challenges of merging your agency. Most industry observers believe that the number of insurance companies will shrink by 50% within this decade, as the strategic need to reduce loss and expense ratios fuels mergers and acquisitions. Achieving economies of scale by reducing geographic spread or focusing on more profitable lines and products has become imperative for national and regional companies alike. In the long term, the trend of carrier consolidation and spinning off non-core business will probably be good for the Independent Agency System. But in the short term, it will create even more challenges for most independent agencies. Faced with consolidation among insurance carriers, the resulting change in operating/placement strategies, and the need to further streamline their internal operations, merger activity has also increased among independent agencies. Current business combination activity is so widespread that experts predict that the number of independent agencies will shrink from approximately 40,000 at the end of the year 2000 to only 20,000 by the end of 2005. Many small to medium-sized agencies are finding that they cant compete in a marketplace where insurance companies are requiring far larger premium commitments every year. Larger agencies, faced with perpetuation concerns and growth plateaus, are increasingly receptive to merger and acquisition overtures from larger agents/brokers, insurance companies, or financial institutions. Although the pressures of premium volume commitments, marketing opportunities, and perpetuation issues lead the list of reasons for entering into a merger, a number of other strategic opportunities might make such a move viable for an independent agency of any size. These reasons include: achieving economies of scale and reducing expenses (particularly service/support staff) adding management or technical expertise expanding the geographic marketplace rounding out part of its book of business (such as Personal Lines) that might not be large enough for existing personnel to handle efficiently developing or expanding a niche or specialization obtaining new producers with established books often just nullifying the competition If your sole motivation for merging with another agency or agencies is to grow, think again. Bigger isn't necessarily better sometimes it can be far worse. There's no doubt that management headaches increase with the size of an organization. Once all of the agency principals have determined that a business combination will complement their strategic plan and you've identified one or more potential merger partners, schedule a 'chemistry' meeting so that all the owners of the agencies can get to know each other better. This will give you an opportunity to discuss some of the softer issues that are generally more critical to the success of a merger than the financial aspects. Is there a compatibility of management styles, underwriting and risk management viewpoints, organizational structures, personnel management disciplines, and personalities? Are there significant differences in ethnic, religious, or political backgrounds that could impact account retention and future management/ownership decisions? Have the parties competed so fiercely in the past that some bad blood might linger? Does one of the agencies have a questionable reputation in the industry or community? For any new venture to succeed, all the partners in the new organization must respect each others honesty and integrity. There'll surely be some rough spots along the way. Without an initial assessment of a common purpose and ethics, those bumps will derail the success of the merger. Assuming that this first meeting between the principals goes well, its time to start sharing specific information on each of the agencies. Because most of this data is confidential financial statements, expirations/large accounts, employee compensation, and so forth have all of the parties sign a Confidentiality Agreement. This legal document will provide protection if the merger discussions terminate or if one of the agencies pulls out. Signing such an agreement doesn't mean that you don't trust the other agency principals; its simply prudent business practice. This chart presents a synopsis of the type of data to share in preparing for the next step in the merger: Five-year review of income and expenses Details on how much of the business has been purchased and how much has been generated internally over the past five years Description of affiliations with other agencies or special marketing programs Review of the most recent balance sheet: the current ratio, receivable ratio, trust ratio, debt, and tangible net worth. Its important to remember that by merging all of you will be jointly taking on the debt of the other agencies. List of stockholders/partners with types of ownership and percentages History of changes in ownership for which outstanding notes or agreements exist Existing Buy/Sell Agreement and other commitments such as deferred compensation/vesting for principals and/or producers Review of non-piracy or non-compete arrangements with non-owner producers Accounts receivable aging and general collection practices for agency-billed business E&O policy limits and claim history History, details, and disposition of EEOC or other litigation against the agency Current list of employees: names, titles, years of service, age, licenses, designations and current compensation Total commissions handled by each producer and each CSR (if available) Review of compensation and employee benefit plans for owners, producers, service, and support staff Three-year review of leading insurance carriers including premiums, loss ratios, and contingents received. Can the important contracts be assigned to the new entity? Review of product mix by line of business (Personal/Commercial/Life/Group) and details within each category Review of special programs or services provided by the agency, including: underwriting/MGA services for carriers; third party administration; joint ventures with carriers or banks; special target/niche markets; and so forth Review of 20 largest accounts: who's handling them and how long they've been with the agency After the agencies have shared this information assign someone to organize it to create a picture of what the new organization will look like. This 'combination document' should include: a profit and loss statement; balance sheet; list of major companies with their respective volumes; distribution of premiums/commissions by line of business; average Personal Lines, Commercial, and Group commissions per account; and productivity measurements compared with each of the agencies and industry standards (see the previous Middle ton Letter for averages). Once the principals have put together a picture of the new agency, each party needs to assess whether the result looks better than each agency does individually. When you evaluate the new organization, characteristics that initially appeared to be complementary might indicate an underlying incompatibility between the various agency operations or management objectives. At this point, its time to re-assess your goals and the feasibility of the proposed merger. After all parties agree that the picture of the combined agencies looks good, start making some key management decisions jointly. Discuss every issue that you can think of and decide how you'd handle them before you make the final decision to merge. DO NOT assume concurrence on anything. Talk about it. Something as simple as picking a new phone system or accountant can be a breaking point. Do all of you agree on the vision for the new organization and on how you're going to reach it? Its imperative for everyone involved to discuss the issues openly. Use this decision-making process before the merger to determine whether you can all get on the same wavelength and work together to resolve problems. And if you're hoping that the merger will help reduce expenses you could well be disappointed at least initially. For the first year after the merger, the additional work and expense of joining the agencies, the enhancement/change to the automation systems, the inevitable personnel issues, and the consolidation of markets will keep productivity down and the profit margin slimmer than you'd like. Recognize that the true economic benefits of the merger will only come after this initial period of adjustment. To build a strong base that leverages the growth potential of the combined agencies, you'll need to invest in personnel, systems and equipment. If your primary reason for merging is to realize an immediate enhancement to the bottom line, rethink and reconsider. To make the merger successful you must agree on how to set up the new organization and which parts of each existing agency systems the new organization will adopt. Although each firm might currently be doing some things well, the new agency must perform better than the sum of its parts. Its essential that you agree on creating a new and better way of doing things. Otherwise, you'll end up with a larger agency that gives all the principals more hassles than they have now with a smaller bottom line. PRELIMINARY ISSUES TO DISCUSS Basic strategic plan. What growth rate do you expect from internal production and what role will acquisitions play? What will be the initial geographic expansion plan? Where do you want the agency to be in five years: location, size, orientation, and market niches? How much Life and Health business do you want? How will you maximize fee or contingent income? What type and size of Group, Commercial and Personal Lines accounts are you going to target? Are there potential new owners in the current organizations and what are the criteria and timetables for nurturing them? Name of the new organization. Although there are often reasons to try to capitalize on existing corporate or personal name recognition, it might be too cumbersome to do so. You might be wise to contact a good public relations firm to set up a new name. Remember that this process could take some time because you'll need to check (especially with state insurance regulators) that no one else has the name you select. Organizational Structure. Define the scope of each of the top management positions that the owners will handle. How much authority will each have in making decisions before they must go back to the Board (group of owners)? How often will the Board meet and for what reasons? How many people will you need in each department and what will the middle management structure be? If you have a separate Small Commercial unit, will it be responsible for sales as well as service? How will you define Small Commercial accounts? How will you keep open lines of communication with a larger number of people? How often will there be sales and/or all-agency meetings? Personnel and Compensation. What will be the compensation program for owners? What and how will you pay non-owner producers? Will producers be allowed to vest in their books of business? How are you going to treat travel, entertainment, auto, promotional expenses, and dues? (Although this policy will probably be different for owners and for non-owner producers you'll need to set specific guidelines.) What will be the vacation and other time-off schedule and will it differ for owners and non-owners? What salary ranges are you going to have for each job position? Do you want to make any adjustments as part of the merger? What are the work hours going to be? Will you allow flex time and/or part-time and how much? What employee benefits will you provide? What about a 401(k), profit sharing plan, or ESOP? What kind of sales or other employee incentive programs do you want? Company Relations. How will you approach companies with the news of the merger? Who will be responsible for negotiating more favorable contracts? What's your timetable for deciding which companies you want to work more closely with and for beginning consolidation efforts? What kind of promotional budget and activities will you plan to maintain company relations and communications? Automation. If the agencies have different computer systems, which system will you use? How many new workstations and printers will you need? What about memory and other system upgrades? What will these changes cost and how long will it take to implement them? How will you load the data from the merging agencies all at once or at first activity? How will you handle training? Vendors/Suppliers. From whom will the new organization get supplies, advertising, phones, cars, legal/accounting assistance, and so forth? OTHER ISSUES TO DISCUSS Valuation. There are a number of ways for the surviving principals to allocate ownership (generally based on the size of the agencies as determined by commissions or revenues and the condition of the balance sheet). Employee Involvement. Let the employees know what's happening as soon as you can. Enlist their input and support in the process. Many mergers don't work simply because the employees don't understand what's happening and feel left out or anxious about whether they'll have a job in the new organization. Don't treat employees as obstacles but as partners in creating a new and better agency. If you've identified cultural differences during the evaluation process, recognize, understand, and deal with them. Be aware that many people have difficulty dealing with change some more so than others. Empathize with the stress that employees are facing and try to provide support and relief. Enhanced Management Direction. Agencies often have a seasoned group of employees that know how to do their jobs with little or no supervision. During the merger process its important to provide more structure and direction. Expect uncertainty and unanswered questions about procedures, reporting relationships, job responsibilities, and so forth. Let everyone know how much they're needed and valued, and be ready to step in to resolve problems that wouldn't be occurring in the absence of the merger. Impact on Productivity. Although combining the agencies should eventually increase productivity, this wont happen overnight. Loss of productivity generally results from new direction, uncertainty over procedures, new insurance company relationships, new employee relationships, and so forth. There will also be some morale problems and turnover from people who are having trouble adjusting to the new environment. Be patient. If you've done your homework in putting the merger together and move quickly to integrate the firms, morale and productivity will bounce back quickly. In the meantime, grin and bear it! Attitude of Principals. People who've owned their own business and called the shots by themselves for a number of years often find it difficult to become part of a larger team of owners. Almost every merger requires former owners to share the decision-making process. Some have a hard time doing this and become disillusioned quickly. Their attitude then rubs off on the employees. If the agency principals initially decided that the merger was the right thing to do, they need to accept the changes involved in order to help their employees adjust to them. The late Carol Hammes, principal of the Middleton Group, was one of the Independent Agency System’s most widely respected management consultants. She will be sorely missed. Reproduced, with permission, from The Middleton Letter.