Managing Personal Lines

CMEditor

This content has not been rated yet.

MANAGING PERSONAL LINES

by Carol Hammes

Continuing fierce competition in commercial lines is making the personal lines niche look much more attractive to those agencies searching for viable growth opportunities. Firms that have been successful in tapping this market are realizing profit margins in excess of 30% and growth rates that are in the double digits. We are convinced that any independent insurance agency regardless of location can be profitable in personal lines and that many can increase their overall agency value by developing an effective personal lines marketing program. The key to success lies in top management commitment. If the owners want to create a thriving department badly enough and if they are willing to make the necessary operational changes to support the effort over the long term, it will happen.

A half-hearted attempt to beef up a lackluster personal lines operation, however, will undoubtedly fail. In most cases, it will be necessary to alter the agency's way of doing business completely in personal lines. It may mean getting rid of long-term employees, drastically cutting the compensation of existing producers, changing account assignments, instituting 800 numbers or company service centers, eliminating a number of insurance companies, or contracting with a direct writer. Unless the agency principals are all willing to make whatever changes are indicated and to give the effort a solid three-year commitment, focus on some other means of achieving your growth objectives.

Designing the System

While there are thousands of ways to structure and manage a personal lines department, most of the successful operations have four common characteristics:

1. The involvement of expensive management and sales personnel has been reduced or eliminated.

2. Procedures are highly automated and standardized.

3. Service staff turnover is low, while productivity levels and morale are high.

4. The account attrition rate is below 8%.

In the exceptional firms that have highly profitable personal lines programs, someone at sometime in the not-so-distant past paid serious attention to setting up a system that would maximize the available resources and minimize the negatives associated with the smaller account sizes. The average independent agency, however, has generally allowed the personal lines department to develop without much sales or management direction. Insurance policies are written for people who walk or call in with most of the sales activity revolving around referrals or commercial account spin-off. When new producers are hired, they are expected to sell personal lines for a period of time to get their feet wet, but the promise is to move them into commercial production once they gain experience. Until recently the career path for service reps has been similar, with the ambitious ones wanting to be 'promoted' out of personal lines into commercial as soon as they have paid their dues (since either in perception or reality the personal lines people are treated like second-class citizens in the agency). Whether by design or default, personal lines is merely tolerated as an accommodation to the community or to insurance company requirements.

Certainly the first step in turning things around is to change the negative attitude about the contribution that personal lines can make to the overall success of the agency. This process has to start with the agency principals who must begin to view personal lines as a viable and integral part of the firm's future. Thanks to the depth and longevity of the commercial soft market, this change in attitude is well on its way. In most general lines agencies that have not yet conducted major surgery on small commercial business, an account review will show that the top third of personal lines accounts produce more in commissions than the bottom third of the commercial accounts. A detailed analysis of the origin of profit-sharing dollars will frequently reveal that personal lines has contributed proportionately more to that income than commercial has. And although insurance companies may have reduced commission rates for auto and homeowners during the past 10 years, premiums have been inching upward in these lines rather than crashing downward as they have on most commercial accounts. Many agency principals have begun to realize that if it were not for personal lines, they might not have a business to call their own anymore.

Assuming that attitude and perception can be changed, it is also important to assess opportunity before jumping headlong into a personal lines marketing program. Evaluate your marketing area for sales potential. What kind of growth is possible in personal lines, particularly if individual life and health coverages are included? Check with insurance companies and the Chamber of Commerce in the communities that could be effectively serviced from your location(s) to obtain the following information: the current and projected future number of households; average age of the population; median income; and the available premium potential for individual property, casualty, life and health coverages.

If there are only 1,000 homes in the marketing area and your agency already writes 700 of them, there's no point in hiring a producer and developing an aggressive personal lines marketing plan unless you are willing to expand geographically. If most of the available accounts are upscale with above-average incomes, the type of people you employ, the marketing approach that you use, and the insurance companies you need will be different than if you are located in a blue-collar or farming community. This information is critical to your success, since decisions relating to the structure and staffing of the personal lines department must take into consideration the number and type of accounts that are available for the agency to write.

Assuming that it makes good marketing sense to cultivate a personal lines profit center and sales program, the next step is to make a serious management commitment to developing the systems, producers, and employees that can effectively support the effort. In most cases, it will be necessary to conduct a complete overhaul of the existing department, its procedures, and personnel. People tend to be creatures of habit, and for most of us, making major changes to personnel, organizational structure, and procedures can be difficult because our attention keeps reverting to the existing reality. One of the best ways to set up a fresh, new marketing approach to personal lines is to forget that the agency is already in that business. Pretend that you have the opportunity to start a new insurance agency without any ties to the past. In your 'new' agency, what would be the best way to handle the selling and servicing of personal lines accounts?

Collect data and possible tips from all available sources: talk to other agents; read or listen to recommendations made by industry consultants; pay attention to what your computer vendor says; solicit suggestions and observations from your own employees, especially those who have worked in other agencies. During the information-gathering process, resist the temptation to reject an idea immediately because 'it will not work in our agency and marketing area.' Add it to the list to be considered as the organizational and procedural decisions are made. Remember, even the most harebrained of schemes has been successful for someone.

When designing an entirely new system, you must forget about the traditional roles that have defined insurance agency job positions in the past and instead focus on the smartest and most efficient way to meet the needs of the consumer with the automated tools that are available today. There are literally thousands of different ways to assign functions to job positions and, while some combinations can be dismissed quickly, unless there is only one person in the department, numerous choices must be made. The following are the major personal lines functions that you should list on one side of a piece of paper: obtain prospects and expiration dates; qualify prospects; provide a proposal/quote; sell the coverage; order the policies; check the policies; provide day-to-day account servicing; handle claims; process and file paper or electronic endorsements and renewal data; contact the insured for renewal update; supervise personnel and handle complex problems; audit accounts for quality control; maintain insurance company relationships.

The job positions that can handle one or several of these functions are:

  • outside producer;
  • inside producer;
  • account manager;
  • senior CSR;
  • CSR;
  • assistant CSR;
  • processor;
  • file clerk;
  • data entry clerk;
  • claims rep;
  • supervisor;
  • department manager.

Which of the job positions do you want to have, and how should the functions be divided among them? Place a position title next to each function on your worksheet. Should property-casualty and life-health coverages be handled by the same people? Should the service reps handle new quotes and sales, and should they input data and handle transactional filing duties? Is it better to have separate claims people, or should those duties also rest with the service reps? Many agencies are disbanding their claims department because automation has made the reporting process much less time-consuming and they believe that it is better to have the person handling the servicing of the account take the claim information.

To complicate the decision further, if there is more than one person for any position how should they divide up the workload? Most agencies have assigned accounts to service reps alphabetically, but with the advent of almost total automation, many are now finding that having the service reps take and handle the calls as they come in is much more efficient. If a processor or assistant CSR is to do the routine paperwork and data entry, is it better to assign one to each service rep, one to every two service reps, or to have a processing pool? Remember, you are starting from scratch, so forget the way it is being handled now and try to ignore the capabilities of your current employees (at least temporarily) in developing the new structure and procedures. As the plan is implemented, it may be necessary to adjust the positions to accommodate some good employees, but the ideal should still serve as the plan to guide future hiring decisions.

Testing the System

Once the initial design has been laid out, test it against the four characteristics of a successful personal lines operation to make sure that it meets each of the criteria.

(1) The involvement of expensive management and sales personnel has been reduced or eliminated. Will the new structure reduce the day-to-day management involvement of expensive agency principals, with most operational decisions being made by people in the department? More important, does it remove the need to compensate producers for servicing and renewing the accounts? The people and systems in the department must be capable of handling virtually all of the transactions on the account after the initial sale, so that the producers can spend their time producing more new business. To compensate the right kind of service personnel for taking this responsibility, most agencies cannot afford to pay the producers full or even half commission on the renewal of personal lines accounts. Producer compensation in personal lines is now most often front-loaded at 50% new and nothing on renewal, but before taking the renewal income away from the producers and asking them not to get involved in the servicing, it is critical to make sure that the accounts will be handled properly.

(2) Procedures are highly automated and standardized. The most profitable of personal lines operations have each transaction being touched only once and leave little room for error or miscommunication. Procedures should be automatic so that agency personnel can focus on meeting the risk-management needs of the customers rather than on how to process a renewal. If download and upload are not feasible with your computer system, can your people at least use E-mail and/or fax capabilities to the greatest extent possible? Are virtually all letters and forms standardized and stored in word processing boilerplate formats? Are all new procedures being put in writing so that there can be no question about how things are to be handled?

Does your plan reduce the number of insurance companies used in personal lines to minimize the variances in procedures and maximize the level of company support for the agency's sales and servicing needs? If you are using company service centers, do you have enough business with those companies to offset the reduced commission levels against agency expense savings? Have you contacted existing and/or new carriers to obtain preferred or at least competitive rates, combination policies, roll-over bonuses or enhanced profit sharing agreements, co-op advertising, prospect lists, producer assistance programs, on-line computer access?

(3) Service staff turnover is low and productivity levels and morale are high. Will the new structure give people in the department an opportunity to feel that what they are doing is important? Will good performance be rewarded with both monetary and non-monetary incentives? Is there someone to provide the necessary supervision and personnel management direction on a daily basis? Are you asking people to wear so many hats that they cannot excel in any one area? One of the most common mistakes that agency principals make is to assume that a good service rep will also be a good salesperson. Most of the time, this is not the case. By setting aggressive sales goals and forcing the CSRs to solicit new business, you take them away from what they are good at, making them unhappy and prone to look elsewhere for employment. And the agency usually has no better sales results than it did when new sales were not part of the CSR job description. If your marketing plan is to grow at a rate that is greater than maintenance level, hire a producer to handle the new business and let the CSRs spend their time servicing and expanding the existing accounts.

Have you re-tested/interviewed existing and new personnel to fill the new job descriptions that have been set up? This could be the most difficult part of implementing the new program since some tough personnel decisions may have to be made. You can be somewhat flexible in adjusting job descriptions to accommodate a good employee, but you cannot afford to protect dead wood as part of the process. Compensation may also have to be adjusted for producers and for CSRs if their job functions or educational requirements have been changed. Do you have a plan for doing this?

Have you set new productivity goals for both the service reps and producers that are high enough to stretch people to reach levels that they heretofore had thought to be unattainable but not so high that they will become discouraged in trying to meet them? The following are some basic guidelines for an above-average agency operating under the optimum conditions that we have described. Note in both charts that we have used average commissions per account (not per policy) as the determinant of the appropriate set of objectives to be used. In the first table, the number of service people includes managers and assistants but not producers.

Average Commissions/Account

Commissions/Service Person

Under $100

$100,000 - $110,000

$100 - $130

$110,000 - $125,000

$131 - $175

$125,000 - $140,000

Over $175

$140,000 - $160,000

A good personal lines producer who can get 35 X-dates a week and convert 25% of them into sold accounts can write 420 accounts in a year. The following chart translates these expectations into annualized commissions.

Average Commissions/Account

New Annual Commisions/Producer

Under $100

$42,000

$100 - $130

$50,000

$131 - $175

$63,000

Over $175

$73,000

(4) The account attrition rate is below 8%. The average annual attrition rate in personal lines is from 8% to 12%, depending on agency location, with firms located in rural areas having the greater retention. To make money on an account, the agency needs to keep it for at least three years. The longer it is retained after that, the more profitable the account and the department will be. Numerous customer surveys confirm that having the most competitive rates in town is not the most important factor in improving agency retention levels. Insureds who are getting the amount of attention they feel they deserve will not switch their business to save 10% on their premiums. But those who believe that they have been treated unfairly or who feel that the agency does not care about them will often switch even if the premium is higher elsewhere. Make sure your new procedures encourage account rounding, emphasize fast turnaround in endorsements, mandate contact from the CSR at least once and preferably twice a year (to update exposure information and let them know you care), and require prompt and courteous response to questions and problems. The key to retention is to have service reps with the time, expertise, and attitude to make a difference.

The late Carol Hammes, principal of The Middleton Group, was one of the Independent Agency System’s most widely respected management consultants. She will be sorely missed.

Login or Register (for FREE) to gain access to thousands of other great articles.

There are no comments posted.
Search Articles/Libraries 
Select a Category
Choose a Content Package
Content Packages 
  • ~/Upload/Images/ContenPackages/editor@completemarkets.com/imms_logo.png
    This article is part of the IMMS Library, which contains more than 2451 documents published by industry-leading authors.